by Linda Peterson
chair, Society of Professional Journalists
Freedom of Information Committee
chair, Society of Professional Journalists
Freedom of Information Committee
Carolyn and Kathryn have done a great job covering what’s
going on at a federal level, but this problem is not trickling, but pouring
down to the states and to local communities across the country.
Back in the states, we don’t like to believe that it all
begins in Washington. But sometimes it’s true. Like in this case.
These policies may have begun here, but they’ve found their
way down to the smallest communities in this nation. As the managing editor of
a group of 8 community papers in the Salt Lake City suburbs, I see the same
policies too often in my neck of the woods.
I don’t know if it’s because they like to follow Big Brother,
or because they figure “Well, they’re getting away with it in Washington; why
can’t we here?” but some of the smallest cities in the nation now have their
own PAOs or people who serve that function as a part of their jobs.
It’s crazy when the feds stonewall you, but it’s even
crazier when the PAO of a city of 10,000 does it.
After all, why would the city be so invested in a $100,000
road repair that they make you go through a PAO to get information about the
project? And what does a PAO know about road base, correct temperatures and conditions
for laying it down, exactly where the work is being done and how long it’s
going to take? Nothing! So, almost everything you ask for you get secondhand,
coming from the mouth of someone who knows almost nothing about the information
you’re trying to get to your readers.
Information that is really important to the people who live
on that street and to others who drive on it.
And it’s even crazier when the PAO insists on being present
at the interview with the engineer. If the engineer misspeaks would the PAO
even know anyway? But that’s what happens sometimes.
I work with several PAOs who understand that, who get out of
the way so I can get to the people who have the information. They understand
that government isn’t a private entity, that it must be transparent.
But many don’t. They see their job as managing the
information and the reporters.
This issue is not reporters whining that PAOs are making
their job harder. It actually would be a whole lot easier just to take what the
PAO tells you and write it as fact.
Maybe that’s why a lot of city officials and PAOs tell me: “None
of the other media outlets are complaining about this. You’re the only one.
They’re all just fine talking just to the PAO.”
That’s why my papers are better, I tell them. We’re not
necessarily better writers, but we have better, more detailed information and
therefore, our stories are better.
Although I’m not a lawyer, I believe my readers deserve and
are expecting from me, “the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth.”
Or as close to it as I can get.
That’s why I wouldn’t give in to the mayor and PAO who asked
me to hire a reporter candidate that they “liked more, who we found out later
was an employee of the PR firm that was doing a branding campaign for that
city.
I can’t get the truth or anywhere near the whole truth when
I have to email the PAO a list of questions for the employee I need to talk to
and have the PIO (not the employee) respond to those questions by email – like
one city expected me to do.
I don’t think my reporters should, as a “professional
courtesy,” call and tell a city’s PAO what stories she’s working on that week –
like another city’s PAO expected them to
do.
There are many instances like these happening on a daily
basis across our country. Stories like this that are still shocking or
ridiculous on a local level but that are commonplace on a federal level. “That’s
just the way it is,” many reporters say. “Deal with it” is what many government
officials say.
But why should we? Why shouldn’t we push for more? Why
shouldn’t we be able to talk directly to those who do the everyday tasks of
taking care of our health, safety and welfare?
We live in the
Information Age. The old adage could easily be changed to “Information is
power,” and whoever has the information has the power. I believe in the case of
government, the public should have that power, and that journalists are the
conduit for that power.
In the past, government viewed interaction with the media as
a necessary evil; they didn’t want to do it but it was expected of them.
As such, reporters could dig into the stories they covered,
find the facts, work to uncover the details that made a difference to their
readers.
They could talk directly to elected officials, those
accountable individuals who their readers voted for – or not – who would answer
to them.
Nobody ever voted for a PAO. No PAO, as yet, has a formal
vote on city, state or federal business – so why does government think the public
should be fine hearing from them all the time, instead of the people they
elected?
And governments and PAOs often end up with ridiculous
consequences, as in the situation this spring when a city parks and rec. person
refused to give me the time of the Easter egg hunt because they had been
instructed not to talk to me. I almost got the time wrong – which would’ve
meant hundreds of irate parents and crying kids descending on City Hall because
they missed the festivities. And all
because a PAO got over-enthusiastic.
This silly example aside, there’s all kinds of information
that the public needs to know and should know that never makes it past the PAOs.
Whether it’s the best of intentions, ignorance of what facts
matter, job security or something else, it doesn’t matter.
My reporters and I are always going to try to go around the
PAO to get to the people with the information because often, PAOs don’t have it
or enough of it. It’s often a very difficult task that takes time and
persistence – a task that should never have to be in the first place – but
often the only way to get to the information.
Sometimes, even with all of our efforts, the PAO blockades
are just too effective. We can’t get through and even the best of us have to go
with the official line and the scraps we can dig up.
It’s not the complete story – it’s the best we can do. But sometimes,
as we all know, the official story isn’t the real story. There were no weapons
of mass destruction ever found in Iraq.
But we can’t give up, we can’t give in. This is too
important.
Whatever PAOs do, we can’t stop searching got the truth.
That’s what my readers expect. And in this, the United
States of America, Land of the Free, that’s what they’re going to get.
But before long, if things don’t change, we may be the only
ones out there doing it.
“Singing with one voice”
Government doesn’t just make policy. It reaches into every
area of our lives: our jobs, our homes, our schools, even our bedrooms. We need
to know and understand what it’s doing and why. Most of the time that
information doesn’t come from a PAO.
People have rights, government doesn’t.
Encouraging and requiring – there’s essentially no
difference. Govt. employees are expected to be part of the funnel. Most of the
time they’re usually not going to stick their necks out and incur the wrath of
their bosses.
The problem is the EXPECTATION that they go through the
PAOs.
No comments:
Post a Comment